Amidst incidents reported from Australia of alleged acts of racial discrimination against Indian students, similar allegations put the biggest democracy on earth on a spot of bother when the Chief Minister of Mizoram, P Lalthanhawla revealed that people inquired about his nationality when he travelled down south back home in India. He was speaking at the Singapore International Water Week.
The statement led to debates to find out the truth whether Indians were as racists as others if not more. Ex-Union minister Manishankar Aiyar defended Lalthanhawla, a fellow Congressman with the routine ‘misinterpreted by the media’ cry and averted that the Mizoram CM could not have been hinting at racism in India when he made that remark. Another ex-Union minister Ravi Shankar Prasad, a member of the BJP agreed with Aiyar thus presenting one of the rare and extraordinary scenes of Indian politics where a Congress and a BJP politician agree on a common point.
But in spite of this televised unity, the truth was actually out in the open for everyone to see that not every Indian felt equally comfortable in his own country. And the reasons of this discomfort often support the theory of India being a racist nation and Indians being racists.
The Mizoram CM’s innocent narration of experiences of his life has a touch of honesty to it. It doesn’t require a deep understanding of the Indian psyche to know that the politician was speaking the truth. There’s every possibility that a resident of any part of India may ask a fellow citizen from the north-eastern states if he’s a Nepali. While lack of awareness is a readily available excuse for this otherwise rude inquiry, it’s still worthy of a debate if such an act amounts to racism.
People of Mongolian origins do have similar features and even someone who’s acutely aware of the nationality of the people from the North-East may not be able to distinguish between a Nepali and a Mizo or a Naga at a first glance. Going by this logic, there’s no reason for the Mizoram CM or anyone else to allege that India is a racist nation. But the cause of the north-eastern discomfort is a little more complicated than what meets the eye.
Apart from being labelled as ‘Chinkys’ (a term widely used in India to refer to people with Mongolian features) and the stories of all the governments at the centre carefully choosing to ignore the north-eastern pleas, there are blatant examples from all over the country that go on to show that people from the north-eastern regions are given enough reasons by their counterparts from other states to dissociate themselves from the mainstream Indian life.
When Prashant Tamang, a resident of Darjeeling, West Bengal won the Indian Idol, a popular singing competition on TV, a Delhi DJ taunted him as a ‘Bahadur’ (apparently a common name for a Nepali securityguard). While Manishankar Aiyar was happy to point out the number of students from North-East in a city like Bangalore in order to refute any remote charge of racial discrimination, he did not discuss the plight and basic problems faced by these students (could be lack of awareness again) in any of the big Indian cities. They largely form ghettos and stick to each other during the campus days. They are considered to be dirty, drug addicts and a lot that has little or no attachment to the traditional Indian values found among people from other regions. Even their food habit (certain groups from the North-East prefer to eat dog meat) is held against them on certain occasions. A few years back, north-eastern students of the prestigious Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) in New Delhi complained of step-motherly treatment by the students’ union during the college elections. They revolted against the JNU tradition of referring to them as Chinkys throughout the year and arranging for Rock concerts when the poll drums started to beat.
Moreover, the high percentage of north-eastern students in any big Indian city itself tells the story of the sorry state of education in those states.
There have been calls for separate states (Gorkhaland) and mini-revolts against blatantly discriminatory acts. Whether it brands India as a racist nation would still remain within the domain of sociologists, it is high time the rest of the country lent patient ears to the problems of the North-East. Denials could be suicidal.
Sunday, June 28, 2009
Saturday, May 23, 2009
Is it wise to judge students on college admission essays?
The fact that there are websites helping students write their college admission essays is a bit confusing. Confusing because on one hand it shows that these essays are serious business and on the other one cannot help but think that the very idea of professional help in writing essays defeats the purpose.
A piece of writing does offer an insight into the mind of the author though it is debatable whether the creation reveals the creator or not. An essay at least helps the reader understand the viewpoint of the author on a particular topic. And to that extent, it’s fair to judge an author depending on this one viewpoint. After all, to judge an author is always a risky job and all the judgments are essentially made attaching particular importance to any one opinion of his.
So there is nothing surprising that colleges would decide to judge aspiring entrants on the basis of their college admission essays. But now that writing these essays has become a business, conducted as professionally as any other business, the whole thing seems trivial.
There are websites that offer professional help to students to write these essays. Come to think of it, what it effectively means that you buy an essay in order to impress the assessor in order to get into a college. And both students and college authorities, in short the entire fraternity takes the exercise with utmost seriousness!
Now I do not know whether these websites could be asked to shut shop by the competent authorities, though it seems unlikely. In that case, colleges would have to come up with an idea to tackle this problem. One way could be to come up with an even full-proof system of testing the ingenuity of the essays though one would imagine such a system is already in place. Usually, someone whose ability to judge a literary piece of work is unquestionable is entrusted with the responsibility of assessing the college admission essays and there is every reason to believe that the person takes his job seriously.
Another solution could be to have the essays read by a panel. It would throw up multiple opinions and a reasonable conclusion could be arrived at in a democratic manner. But then, the disadvantage of too many cooks is also something that we are well aware of.
I do not doubt the college authorities to come up with an effective mechanism, no matter how unique it has to be. Educationists are after all some of the smartest men in the society and probably the only lot that carries a certificate of societal approval of their smartness. But one still wonders whether the most basic strategy is the most effective one at times or not. In this case, the basic strategy would be to judge students on the basis of their academic achievements followed by interviews and not try and understand them through the college admission essays.
The websites though would complain.
A piece of writing does offer an insight into the mind of the author though it is debatable whether the creation reveals the creator or not. An essay at least helps the reader understand the viewpoint of the author on a particular topic. And to that extent, it’s fair to judge an author depending on this one viewpoint. After all, to judge an author is always a risky job and all the judgments are essentially made attaching particular importance to any one opinion of his.
So there is nothing surprising that colleges would decide to judge aspiring entrants on the basis of their college admission essays. But now that writing these essays has become a business, conducted as professionally as any other business, the whole thing seems trivial.
There are websites that offer professional help to students to write these essays. Come to think of it, what it effectively means that you buy an essay in order to impress the assessor in order to get into a college. And both students and college authorities, in short the entire fraternity takes the exercise with utmost seriousness!
Now I do not know whether these websites could be asked to shut shop by the competent authorities, though it seems unlikely. In that case, colleges would have to come up with an idea to tackle this problem. One way could be to come up with an even full-proof system of testing the ingenuity of the essays though one would imagine such a system is already in place. Usually, someone whose ability to judge a literary piece of work is unquestionable is entrusted with the responsibility of assessing the college admission essays and there is every reason to believe that the person takes his job seriously.
Another solution could be to have the essays read by a panel. It would throw up multiple opinions and a reasonable conclusion could be arrived at in a democratic manner. But then, the disadvantage of too many cooks is also something that we are well aware of.
I do not doubt the college authorities to come up with an effective mechanism, no matter how unique it has to be. Educationists are after all some of the smartest men in the society and probably the only lot that carries a certificate of societal approval of their smartness. But one still wonders whether the most basic strategy is the most effective one at times or not. In this case, the basic strategy would be to judge students on the basis of their academic achievements followed by interviews and not try and understand them through the college admission essays.
The websites though would complain.
WAKE UP CALL FOR THE LEFT
The mood in Kolkata was different after the results of the 15th Lok Sabha elections were declared.
The usual scene before every election, whether municipality or Lok Sabha is a confident bunch of left supporters making light of the opposition aspirations of toppling the government that has stood the test of time for 32 years (the Left Front government in West Bengal will complete their 34th year in office when they face the next assembly elections in 2011). The opposition supporters on the other hand would inevitably point fingers at the ‘left electoral malpractices’ which include rigging, false voting, booth jamming, pre-poll terror and violence to press the panic button among voters. Left supporters would brush aside all the allegations by saying that it was a people's mandate.
The 15th Lok Sabha results though saw different and previously unseen reactions from both camps. A left drubbing was predicted in these elections by all and sundry because of Singur, Nandigram, the mysterious death of a young graphic designer Rizwanur Rehman in Kolkata and the administration’s apparent involvement in it. The minority vote bank they said was slipping out of the left grip. Leftists never took these apprehensions seriously and banked on their strong organisational structure to sail over these elections. Also, they said that the people of West Bengal would never vote for a whimsical opposition leader, Mamata Banerjee.
On May 15, a day before the counting at about 11 pm a friend who’s also a Democratic Youth Federation of India (DYFI, a left organisation) worker had a few ‘inside’ information for me. The Left tally, he said could never go below 30 (West Bengal has 42 Lok Sabha constituencies). He also named a few neck and neck seats (Jadavpur, North Kolkata, Uluberia, Contai, Murshidabad etc) and expressed his belief that the left candidates were certain to win in those seats. There was no reason not to believe him for someone who has witnessed these ‘left predictions’ come true in several elections. The optimism that the opposition had shown in West Bengal before previous elections were always found to be misplaced and lacking of solid reasoning after the results were announced.
The most startling revelation from my friend though was yet to come. He seemed quietly confident of the fact that even though Mamata would win from her South Kolkata seat, her margin was certain to come down as compared to the last Lok Sabha elections in 2004. Significantly, while Mamata had a winning margin of close to 200,000 in 1999, she suffered almost a 50 per cent loss in her margin in ’04.
On May 16, as the counting started, the left complacency took a serious jolt as opposition candidates were leading in traditional left bastions after the first few rounds of counting. Staunch left supporters though were certain of a recovery in the latter half of the day. Supporters even took out a colourful procession in anticipation of a left victory in Dum Dum constituency. In the neighbouring constituency of Barrackpore, Tarit Topdar, the CPM candidate was busy chalking out plans for his victory celebrations. But as the day progressed, it became quite clear that the results were reversed in West Bengal this time round. Both Topdar and Amitava Nundy, the CPM candidate from Dum Dum were defeated by Trinamool Congress (TMC) candidates.
Almost all the neck and neck seats including North Kolkata, Jadavpur, Uluberia, Murshidabad, Contai, Serampore, Krishnagar, Bongaon, Mathurapur, Joynagar were won by the opposition. Left candidates were defeated in constituencies known as left strongholds such as Basirhat, Birbhum, Howrah, Hooghly, Tamluk in addition to Dum Dum and Barrackpore. Left stalwarts were humbled by newcomers in Lok Sabha elections in many seats. Mamata not only won but more than doubled her margin from the last elections by taking it past the 200,000 mark. The Left tally was 15 as against 30 predicted by my friend.
What happened in 2009 that the usually spot-on left predictions were proved to be wrong? True, there was a fear of the anti-incumbency factor but that fear was there all through the last 32 years. True, that in and around Kolkata, the capital there was not even a single constituency which was under the left control after the results were declared. But equally true is the fact that the left brigade never really banked on the urban votes to win elections after elections. In fact, barring 2004, voters of Kolkata always voted against the ruling Left Front government in the last 32 years. The topmost reason is obviously the peasants' and workers’ party losing the confidence of the peasants and the down-trodden people post Singur and Nandigram. The haste with which the state government went about land acquisition for industries in the state did not go down well with the rural voters, who largely depend on agriculture and land for livelihood. Secondly, Muslims in the state seemed to come to believe that the CPM was not their friend anymore. In addition to the apparent involvement of some of the top ranked police officers of the state, including the then Commissioner of Police, Kolkata in the Rizwanur Rehman murder case, the Sachar Commission report too vindicated this stand of both Bengali and Urdu speaking Muslims of West Bengal.
As the countrywide results reflected, public mood favouring Manmohan Singh and the UPA government over LK Advani and NDA must have also accounted for the left debacle in West Bengal (the leftists had a fall out with the UPA government over the Indo-US civil nuclear deal). But what must have hurt them the most was the arrogance of their leaders and workers. What definitely did not go down well with the voters of West Bengal was the administrative apathy to take the state forward even after 32 years in power by its ministers and leaders. What more, the left leaders have been most adamant to admit their mistakes which more often than not were blunders.
Come 2011 and critics predict that the year would mark an end to a historic chapter in parliamentary democracy worldwide. Holder of the Guiness record for the longest standing elected government in the world, the CPM-led Third Front would have to pass the mantle on to the opposition after 34 years of uninterrupted ruling in West Bengal. An analysis of the results of the recently concluded Lok Sabha elections shows that the Left Front was defeated in 190 of the 294 assembly constituencies in West Bengal, whereas they had won 235 of those in the last assembly elections in 2006.
It will surely not be wise to write off the Left Front on the basis of one Lok Sabha elections but one thing is for sure. The public mood is not in its favour and serious damage control needs to be done to consolidate its position in the state. The problem is that time is running out. Surely, the 2011 assembly elections in West Bengal is going to pose the toughest challenge before the ‘Bhadrolok Party’ of Bengal.
The usual scene before every election, whether municipality or Lok Sabha is a confident bunch of left supporters making light of the opposition aspirations of toppling the government that has stood the test of time for 32 years (the Left Front government in West Bengal will complete their 34th year in office when they face the next assembly elections in 2011). The opposition supporters on the other hand would inevitably point fingers at the ‘left electoral malpractices’ which include rigging, false voting, booth jamming, pre-poll terror and violence to press the panic button among voters. Left supporters would brush aside all the allegations by saying that it was a people's mandate.
The 15th Lok Sabha results though saw different and previously unseen reactions from both camps. A left drubbing was predicted in these elections by all and sundry because of Singur, Nandigram, the mysterious death of a young graphic designer Rizwanur Rehman in Kolkata and the administration’s apparent involvement in it. The minority vote bank they said was slipping out of the left grip. Leftists never took these apprehensions seriously and banked on their strong organisational structure to sail over these elections. Also, they said that the people of West Bengal would never vote for a whimsical opposition leader, Mamata Banerjee.
On May 15, a day before the counting at about 11 pm a friend who’s also a Democratic Youth Federation of India (DYFI, a left organisation) worker had a few ‘inside’ information for me. The Left tally, he said could never go below 30 (West Bengal has 42 Lok Sabha constituencies). He also named a few neck and neck seats (Jadavpur, North Kolkata, Uluberia, Contai, Murshidabad etc) and expressed his belief that the left candidates were certain to win in those seats. There was no reason not to believe him for someone who has witnessed these ‘left predictions’ come true in several elections. The optimism that the opposition had shown in West Bengal before previous elections were always found to be misplaced and lacking of solid reasoning after the results were announced.
The most startling revelation from my friend though was yet to come. He seemed quietly confident of the fact that even though Mamata would win from her South Kolkata seat, her margin was certain to come down as compared to the last Lok Sabha elections in 2004. Significantly, while Mamata had a winning margin of close to 200,000 in 1999, she suffered almost a 50 per cent loss in her margin in ’04.
On May 16, as the counting started, the left complacency took a serious jolt as opposition candidates were leading in traditional left bastions after the first few rounds of counting. Staunch left supporters though were certain of a recovery in the latter half of the day. Supporters even took out a colourful procession in anticipation of a left victory in Dum Dum constituency. In the neighbouring constituency of Barrackpore, Tarit Topdar, the CPM candidate was busy chalking out plans for his victory celebrations. But as the day progressed, it became quite clear that the results were reversed in West Bengal this time round. Both Topdar and Amitava Nundy, the CPM candidate from Dum Dum were defeated by Trinamool Congress (TMC) candidates.
Almost all the neck and neck seats including North Kolkata, Jadavpur, Uluberia, Murshidabad, Contai, Serampore, Krishnagar, Bongaon, Mathurapur, Joynagar were won by the opposition. Left candidates were defeated in constituencies known as left strongholds such as Basirhat, Birbhum, Howrah, Hooghly, Tamluk in addition to Dum Dum and Barrackpore. Left stalwarts were humbled by newcomers in Lok Sabha elections in many seats. Mamata not only won but more than doubled her margin from the last elections by taking it past the 200,000 mark. The Left tally was 15 as against 30 predicted by my friend.
What happened in 2009 that the usually spot-on left predictions were proved to be wrong? True, there was a fear of the anti-incumbency factor but that fear was there all through the last 32 years. True, that in and around Kolkata, the capital there was not even a single constituency which was under the left control after the results were declared. But equally true is the fact that the left brigade never really banked on the urban votes to win elections after elections. In fact, barring 2004, voters of Kolkata always voted against the ruling Left Front government in the last 32 years. The topmost reason is obviously the peasants' and workers’ party losing the confidence of the peasants and the down-trodden people post Singur and Nandigram. The haste with which the state government went about land acquisition for industries in the state did not go down well with the rural voters, who largely depend on agriculture and land for livelihood. Secondly, Muslims in the state seemed to come to believe that the CPM was not their friend anymore. In addition to the apparent involvement of some of the top ranked police officers of the state, including the then Commissioner of Police, Kolkata in the Rizwanur Rehman murder case, the Sachar Commission report too vindicated this stand of both Bengali and Urdu speaking Muslims of West Bengal.
As the countrywide results reflected, public mood favouring Manmohan Singh and the UPA government over LK Advani and NDA must have also accounted for the left debacle in West Bengal (the leftists had a fall out with the UPA government over the Indo-US civil nuclear deal). But what must have hurt them the most was the arrogance of their leaders and workers. What definitely did not go down well with the voters of West Bengal was the administrative apathy to take the state forward even after 32 years in power by its ministers and leaders. What more, the left leaders have been most adamant to admit their mistakes which more often than not were blunders.
Come 2011 and critics predict that the year would mark an end to a historic chapter in parliamentary democracy worldwide. Holder of the Guiness record for the longest standing elected government in the world, the CPM-led Third Front would have to pass the mantle on to the opposition after 34 years of uninterrupted ruling in West Bengal. An analysis of the results of the recently concluded Lok Sabha elections shows that the Left Front was defeated in 190 of the 294 assembly constituencies in West Bengal, whereas they had won 235 of those in the last assembly elections in 2006.
It will surely not be wise to write off the Left Front on the basis of one Lok Sabha elections but one thing is for sure. The public mood is not in its favour and serious damage control needs to be done to consolidate its position in the state. The problem is that time is running out. Surely, the 2011 assembly elections in West Bengal is going to pose the toughest challenge before the ‘Bhadrolok Party’ of Bengal.
Saturday, December 6, 2008
Idiot Box Idiosyncracies
Following the trend is a common thing in Indian news TV and all one has to do is catch the fancy of the viewers one evening for an hour with something ‘out of the box’ (at times the phrase is applied after the success of the particular idea) and the trend is set.
One such trend these days is to remind or give the viewers another opportunity to catch up on what happened in popular TV shows. It must have started as a weekly dosage but quickly became an overdose. Thus, for the last few weeks, Indian news TV viewers were tired of watching what happened in Big Boss, the Indian version of Big Brother almost everyday.
Come to think of it, what’s the idea behind showing what happened in a reality show or a soap opera last evening! Particularly, when it was telecast in the same country! A weekly rewind of all that happened in TV all of last week sounds novel but watching what happened in other TV shows on news TV on a daily basis becomes pointless after a while.
But the trend will continue till another one takes over. Thankfully, we have seen the end of Big Boss for the time being.
Things changed in a whirlwind in Indian news TV. Even before one could wake up to the reality of 24 hour news, it was segmented and dedicated sports, entertainment and business bulletins were in place. Earlier, entertainment news bulletins were the entertainment channels’ business and sports news always found space in the last few minutes and headlines of a bulletin. Unless something really big had happened, neither sports nor entertainment stories were preferred as the lead story. And now, who was declared winner in Big Boss could be the lead story in a general news bulletin depending on what else had happened by the time the bulletin was telecast. Needless to say, the entertainment bulletin will have more than one Big Boss stories that day.
Do we, viewers, actually prefer watching what happened in the TV shows that we anyway are so passionate about in news bulletins? Tricky question and one should never risk answering on others’ behalf. But one thing is for sure. The news channels are getting their TRP. Otherwise, the trend would have never been set.
One such trend these days is to remind or give the viewers another opportunity to catch up on what happened in popular TV shows. It must have started as a weekly dosage but quickly became an overdose. Thus, for the last few weeks, Indian news TV viewers were tired of watching what happened in Big Boss, the Indian version of Big Brother almost everyday.
Come to think of it, what’s the idea behind showing what happened in a reality show or a soap opera last evening! Particularly, when it was telecast in the same country! A weekly rewind of all that happened in TV all of last week sounds novel but watching what happened in other TV shows on news TV on a daily basis becomes pointless after a while.
But the trend will continue till another one takes over. Thankfully, we have seen the end of Big Boss for the time being.
Things changed in a whirlwind in Indian news TV. Even before one could wake up to the reality of 24 hour news, it was segmented and dedicated sports, entertainment and business bulletins were in place. Earlier, entertainment news bulletins were the entertainment channels’ business and sports news always found space in the last few minutes and headlines of a bulletin. Unless something really big had happened, neither sports nor entertainment stories were preferred as the lead story. And now, who was declared winner in Big Boss could be the lead story in a general news bulletin depending on what else had happened by the time the bulletin was telecast. Needless to say, the entertainment bulletin will have more than one Big Boss stories that day.
Do we, viewers, actually prefer watching what happened in the TV shows that we anyway are so passionate about in news bulletins? Tricky question and one should never risk answering on others’ behalf. But one thing is for sure. The news channels are getting their TRP. Otherwise, the trend would have never been set.
Saturday, September 6, 2008
West Bengal: The Industrialisation Dilemma
The new found interest of people in the state of West Bengal is a tad too disturbing as it gives rise to a number of questions. Firstly, why all of a sudden after so many years, all corners of the country are so concerned about industrialization in Bengal? Secondly, are they aware of the CPI(M)’s ‘developmental’ approach in all spheres of life in the state for the last three decades? Thirdly, now that almost all the states have gone past West Bengal in the race for development, does it really matter if West Bengal does not wake up at all from this ‘chosen’ slumber? Fourthly, do the outsiders (read the pundits in Delhi) know anything about the Guinness record-holder government in the state of West Bengal? There are more questions that will surface as this piece goes on.
For a generation born in the left regime, it was always a story of frustration, disillusionment and hoping against hope. Today, any and every ignorant, innocent bystander asks, ‘Are you against development’ when you take side with the farmers who are agitating in Singur.
Well, the answer to the question is of course no. But the question is not so simple to be answered in yes or no. All sensible residents of West Bengal desperately mooted for development, which inevitably meant industrialization for the last three decades. They became a despaired lot in these years because of the state government’s approach. When the left came in power, they drove away all the investors, closed down factories and put hindrances in all developmental work under the pretext of ‘protecting workers’ rights’. As if the workers in Bengal were an impoverished, neglected, exploited lot compared to the workers in other states! Only at the turn of the 21st century did the state government realize that they had to change their weird, nonsensical policy. By then, developmental work had almost reached a saturation point in the states of Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh, Haryana, Punjab and Maharashtra. And by the time this article is written, there are reports that the IT boom in the southern states is dying a natural death and companies of the stature of IBM are reluctant to keep their word with IT job aspirants from even IIT Chennai.
When a policy change happens after three decades and lives are lost as a result, it is sure not to go down well with those sensible residents. Let me try and understand the desperation of the CPI(M) government.
There are states that generate revenue from tourism and education, Rajasthan and Maharashtra for example. These two important sectors have not only been neglected by the CPI(M) government but one of them, education, it could be safely said has been murdered following a meticulous plan. Archaic syllabus, an age-old mindset that 60%, a mark which hardly impresses anyone the world over should be reserved for the ‘cream’ and complete ignorance towards the emerging fields of study have all added to the collapse of the education system in West Bengal. Thus, special trains are run to carry students of West Bengal to appear for the Common Entrance Test (CET) examination in Karnataka, students from the state enroll themselves in hordes for ordinary BA, BSC, BCOM courses in Pune and a student coming to West Bengal for educational purposes is rightly looked upon as an alien if he is not a student of one of the two central government run institutes, IIM Calcutta and IIT Kharagpur and a private institute, West Bengal National University of Juridical Sciences (WBNUJS). As for the University of Pune, it continues to prosper with faculties not half as good as their counterparts in the University of Calcutta.
As regards tourism, the state cannot boast of a single tourist spot including its capital Calcutta, the ex-capital of India. Foreigners come to India with a plan to visit the Taj Mahal, Lal Qilla and the innumerable forts in Rajasthan but not Victoria Memorial. With the Himalayas (Kanchenjunga, the third highest peak could be seen from Darjeeling and other townships of North Bengal), the Bay of Bengal and the Sunderbans at its disposal, what is the state government’s excuse for such a poor state of tourism in Bengal? Himachal Pradesh boasts of a number of hill stations, most of whom would fail to give Darjeeling a run for its money. Still, West Bengal lies at the bottom of the barrel as far as revenue earned from tourism is concerned!
It is common knowledge that had these sectors prospered, this desperate need for development could have been avoided, people in West Bengal would have been a happier lot even without the Nano factory and they would have come out of this self-imposed frog-of-the well despicable state of theirs.
Here is a (and not the) perspective of a resident of West Bengal. All that matters to me is the fall of this double standard, murderous and anti-development government. I am happy with the way things are in the state of West Bengal. I do not want to see the CPI(M) take credit for West Bengal’s development for the simple reason that they did not claim responsibilities for the poor state of the state. I would vote for the Congress, BJP, BSP, SP, AIADMK, MNS, Shiv Sena, independent candidates – anyone to see this government go. Let me be very clear, the state has nothing to lose, it cannot languish any further than what the left front government is already responsible for.
For a generation born in the left regime, it was always a story of frustration, disillusionment and hoping against hope. Today, any and every ignorant, innocent bystander asks, ‘Are you against development’ when you take side with the farmers who are agitating in Singur.
Well, the answer to the question is of course no. But the question is not so simple to be answered in yes or no. All sensible residents of West Bengal desperately mooted for development, which inevitably meant industrialization for the last three decades. They became a despaired lot in these years because of the state government’s approach. When the left came in power, they drove away all the investors, closed down factories and put hindrances in all developmental work under the pretext of ‘protecting workers’ rights’. As if the workers in Bengal were an impoverished, neglected, exploited lot compared to the workers in other states! Only at the turn of the 21st century did the state government realize that they had to change their weird, nonsensical policy. By then, developmental work had almost reached a saturation point in the states of Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh, Haryana, Punjab and Maharashtra. And by the time this article is written, there are reports that the IT boom in the southern states is dying a natural death and companies of the stature of IBM are reluctant to keep their word with IT job aspirants from even IIT Chennai.
When a policy change happens after three decades and lives are lost as a result, it is sure not to go down well with those sensible residents. Let me try and understand the desperation of the CPI(M) government.
There are states that generate revenue from tourism and education, Rajasthan and Maharashtra for example. These two important sectors have not only been neglected by the CPI(M) government but one of them, education, it could be safely said has been murdered following a meticulous plan. Archaic syllabus, an age-old mindset that 60%, a mark which hardly impresses anyone the world over should be reserved for the ‘cream’ and complete ignorance towards the emerging fields of study have all added to the collapse of the education system in West Bengal. Thus, special trains are run to carry students of West Bengal to appear for the Common Entrance Test (CET) examination in Karnataka, students from the state enroll themselves in hordes for ordinary BA, BSC, BCOM courses in Pune and a student coming to West Bengal for educational purposes is rightly looked upon as an alien if he is not a student of one of the two central government run institutes, IIM Calcutta and IIT Kharagpur and a private institute, West Bengal National University of Juridical Sciences (WBNUJS). As for the University of Pune, it continues to prosper with faculties not half as good as their counterparts in the University of Calcutta.
As regards tourism, the state cannot boast of a single tourist spot including its capital Calcutta, the ex-capital of India. Foreigners come to India with a plan to visit the Taj Mahal, Lal Qilla and the innumerable forts in Rajasthan but not Victoria Memorial. With the Himalayas (Kanchenjunga, the third highest peak could be seen from Darjeeling and other townships of North Bengal), the Bay of Bengal and the Sunderbans at its disposal, what is the state government’s excuse for such a poor state of tourism in Bengal? Himachal Pradesh boasts of a number of hill stations, most of whom would fail to give Darjeeling a run for its money. Still, West Bengal lies at the bottom of the barrel as far as revenue earned from tourism is concerned!
It is common knowledge that had these sectors prospered, this desperate need for development could have been avoided, people in West Bengal would have been a happier lot even without the Nano factory and they would have come out of this self-imposed frog-of-the well despicable state of theirs.
Here is a (and not the) perspective of a resident of West Bengal. All that matters to me is the fall of this double standard, murderous and anti-development government. I am happy with the way things are in the state of West Bengal. I do not want to see the CPI(M) take credit for West Bengal’s development for the simple reason that they did not claim responsibilities for the poor state of the state. I would vote for the Congress, BJP, BSP, SP, AIADMK, MNS, Shiv Sena, independent candidates – anyone to see this government go. Let me be very clear, the state has nothing to lose, it cannot languish any further than what the left front government is already responsible for.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
